RESUMEN
The association between obesity and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT) has shown conflicting results. This study aimed to evaluate whether metabolic abnormalities (MA) increase the risk of all-cause mortality in these patients. Between 2009 and 2015, 1141 patients undergoing KFRT were recruited from the Clinical Research Center for End-Stage Renal Disease dataset. Patients were divided into four groups according to the presence of obesity and MA. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to determine the association between the phenotypes and all-cause mortality. During a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, all-cause mortality was observed in 491 (43.0%) patients. Obesity had a 24% decreased risk of all-cause mortality compared with non-obesity. In contrast, the presence of MA showed a 1.53-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality. There was a significant interaction between obesity and MA (p = 0.006). In Cox proportional hazard analyses after adjustment of confounding factors, the metabolically abnormal non-obesity (MANO) phenotype showed a 1.63-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality compared with the metabolically healthy non-obesity phenotype. In subgroup analysis, the risk of all-cause mortality was higher in the MANO phenotype; this phenotype was significantly associated with a higher all-cause mortality in patients undergoing KFRT.
RESUMEN
The waiting time to deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) is long in Asian countries. We investigated the impact of sensitization and ABO blood type (ABO) on DDKT opportunity using two Korean cohorts: a hospital cohort from two centers and a national database. The impact of panel reactive antibody (PRA) based on the maximal PRA% and ABO on DDKT accessibility was analyzed using a competing risks regression model. In the hospital cohort (n = 4722), 88.2%, 8.7%, and 3.1% of patients belonged to < 80%, 80-99%, and ≥ 99% PRA groups, respectively, and 61.1%, 11.6%, and 27.3% belonged to A or B, AB, and O blood types, respectively. When PRA and ABO were combined, PRA < 80%/A or B and 80 ≤ PRA < 99%/AB had fewer DDKT opportunities (median, 12 years; subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.71) compared with PRA < 80%/AB (median, 11 years). Also, PRA < 80%/O, 80 ≤ PRA < 99%/A or B, and PRA ≥ 99%/AB had a much lower DDKT opportunity (median, 13 years; sHR, 0.49). Furthermore, 80 ≤ PRA < 99%/O and PRA ≥ 99%/non-AB had the lowest DDKT opportunity (sHR, 0.28). We found similar results in the national cohort (n = 18,974). In conclusion, an integrated priority system for PRA and ABO is needed to reduce the inequity in DDKT opportunities, particularly in areas with prolonged waiting times.
